Why Clicky validates your traffic
A couple users in our forums were just talking about how their Google Analytics reports are unreliable because people have copied their GA tracking code (for reasons unknown) onto their web sites, and now the traffic from these other sites is being reported in GA alongside the "real" traffic that should only be getting logged in the first place.
We had no idea GA allowed this to happen and frankly, we were surprised to hear it. If I was a griefer, and I owned a high traffic, off-color web site, I might get my lulz by regularly including the GA code from other random sites in my own web site's HTML. Hypothetically, of course :)
This is one of the reasons we chose to validate your traffic against your registered domain name before logging it. And this was one of the very, very first things we ever did when we were designing Clicky. We're talking October 2006, before Clicky was even available to the public. This has caused headaches for some users over the years, e.g. if they mistype their domain when registering, or their domain changes but they don't update it on Clicky, then no traffic gets logged. But for the most part it's worked well for everyone, and to make it flexible we have offered (also from day 1) a "mirrors" option to add additional domains that are authorized to log traffic for a certain site ID.
We don't know if other analytics services do any validation, but if not, maybe we should add another bullet point to ye olde matrix. I imagine Google may do this for support reasons, so they get as few questions about "why aren't my stats working" as possible, but we still don't agree with it. We get support questions about this maybe once a week, but we have no problem helping people out with it.
What do you think?
17 comments | Aug 11 2010 5:43pm
We had no idea GA allowed this to happen and frankly, we were surprised to hear it. If I was a griefer, and I owned a high traffic, off-color web site, I might get my lulz by regularly including the GA code from other random sites in my own web site's HTML. Hypothetically, of course :)
This is one of the reasons we chose to validate your traffic against your registered domain name before logging it. And this was one of the very, very first things we ever did when we were designing Clicky. We're talking October 2006, before Clicky was even available to the public. This has caused headaches for some users over the years, e.g. if they mistype their domain when registering, or their domain changes but they don't update it on Clicky, then no traffic gets logged. But for the most part it's worked well for everyone, and to make it flexible we have offered (also from day 1) a "mirrors" option to add additional domains that are authorized to log traffic for a certain site ID.
We don't know if other analytics services do any validation, but if not, maybe we should add another bullet point to ye olde matrix. I imagine Google may do this for support reasons, so they get as few questions about "why aren't my stats working" as possible, but we still don't agree with it. We get support questions about this maybe once a week, but we have no problem helping people out with it.
What do you think?
17 comments | Aug 11 2010 5:43pm

Recent Comments
Great stuff. Thanks One thing I would like to see in the visitor detail/action page ... Daniel, Feb 04 2012 Nice interface changes :) On the lightbox for visitor detail, why not take it ... Jason, Feb 03 2012 LOVE love love it! Thanks guys. Susan Lassiter-Lyons, Feb 03 2012 Nice Work! How about cyan for hourly, dark blue for non? You could go green, t ... Joey, Feb 03 2012 We use clicky on our site http://www.xpress-media.co.uk and its far better than ... Web Design Sheffield, Feb 03 2012 What is the difference with Conversions and Visits to goal? I have 2 conversions ... Martin, Feb 02 2012 Wow!!! Just the update I was looking for. Thanks!! This is super! Spicer Matthews, Feb 02 2012 Regarding hourly color. I am no color expert by any stretch of the imagination, but ... mark@whatTOdoToronto.com, Feb 02 2012 Really nice update! Keep up the excellent work! Thanks! Philippe, Feb 02 2012 Great update I am loving it :) Andrew, Feb 02 2012